This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.This theme is Bloggerized by Lasantha Bandara - Premiumbloggertemplates.com.

বৃহস্পতিবার, ২৫ অক্টোবর, ২০১৮

Namaste England | Official Trailer | Arjun Kapoor, Parineeti Chopra | Vipul Amrutlal Shah | Oct 19

Namaste England | Official Trailer | Arjun Kapoor, Parineeti Chopra | Vipul Amrutlal Shah | Oct 19


Download Here

Share:

বুধবার, ২৪ অক্টোবর, ২০১৮

Bassbaba Sumon Speech - Rise Above All

 Bassbaba Sumon Speech - Rise Above All

dowenload here

Share:

Plane Crashes Into Pacific Ocean, Makes Miracle Landing

Plane Crashes Into Pacific Ocean, Makes Miracle                      Landing                        

Dowenload here

Share:

সোমবার, ২২ অক্টোবর, ২০১৮

My Experience with Sports


My Experience with Sports 



 

Share:

Khashoggi death: Saudi Arabia says journalist was murdered

Khashoggi death: Saudi Arabia says journalist was murdered এর ছবির ফলাফল

Saudi Arabia has blamed the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi on a "rogue operation", giving a new account of an act that sparked a global outcry.
Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir told Fox News "the murder" had been a "tremendous mistake" and denied the powerful crown prince had ordered it.
The journalist was last seen entering the Saudi consulate in Istanbul.
The Saudis, under intense pressure to explain the journalist's whereabouts, have offered conflicting accounts.
They initially said he had left the building unharmed on 2 October but on Friday admitted for the first time he was dead, saying he had been killed in a fight. This claim met widespread scepticism.
Turkish officials believe Khashoggi, a prominent critic of the Saudi government, was murdered by a team of Saudi agents inside the building and say they have evidence to prove it.

How has the Saudi version of events changed?

Adel al-Jubeir's comments, describing the incident as murder, are some of the most direct to come from a Saudi official.
"We are determined to find out all the facts and we are determined to punish those who are responsible for this murder," he said.
"The individuals who did this did this outside the scope of their authority," he added. "There obviously was a tremendous mistake made, and what compounded the mistake was the attempt to try to cover up."

He also said that they did not know where the body was and insisted the action had not been ordered by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, seen as Saudi Arabia's most powerful figure.
"Even the senior leadership of our intelligence service was not aware of this," he said, calling it a "rogue operation".
These remarks followed Saudi Arabia's admission on Friday that Khashoggi had died. A statement from the public prosecutor said he had been killed when a fight broke out with some of the people he was meeting inside the consulate.
Until this point - for 18 days - the authorities had maintained that the Saudi critic was last seen leaving the building alive.
They then said they had arrested 18 people, sacked two aides of Mohammed bin Salman and set up a body, under his leadership, to reform the intelligence agency over the killing.
Both King Salman and the crown prince called Khashoggi's son, Salah, on Sunday to express their condolences over his death, the Saudi Press Agency reports.
Salah Khashoggi resides in Saudi Arabia and, according to the Wall Street Journal, had been barred from leaving the country to visit his father who was living in self-imposed exile in the US.
Meanwhile, Jamal Khashoggi's fiancée. Hatice Cengiz, who raised the alarm about his disappearance after waiting for him for hours outside the consulate, was given 24-hour police protection, Turkish state news agency Anadolu reports.

How has the world reacted?

In a Washington Post interview on Saturday, US President Donald Trump said there had been "deception" and "lies" in Saudi Arabia's explanation, having previously said he found their narrative to be credible.
He said he would "love" it if the crown prince was not responsible for the murder. The president has raised the possibility of imposing sanctions but said halting an arms deal would "hurt us more than it would hurt them".

The UK, France and Germany issued a joint statement expressing shock at the death and demanding a full explanation, saying: "Nothing can justify this killing and we condemn it in the strongest possible terms."
German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said she will not allow arms exports to Saudi Arabia to continue given "the current circumstances", and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has threatened to cancel a multi-billion dollar defence contract with the kingdom over the affair.

Share:

রবিবার, ২১ অক্টোবর, ২০১৮

Taiwan train derailment in Yilan County kills at least 18

Taiwan train derailment in Yilan County kills at least 18

Image copyright TAIWAN RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION / HANDOUT
Image caption Rescue operations are continuing into the night
At least 18 people have been killed and 148 injured in a passenger train derailment in north-east Taiwan.
Railway authorities say they are investigating the accident, which happened in Yilan County at about 16:50 local time (08:50 GMT) on Sunday.
A total of 366 people were on the train travelling between Taipei and the eastern county of Taitung when all eight of its carriages derailed.
Taiwan's Central News Agency reports that dozens may still be trapped.
The Puyuma Express 6432 service reportedly came off the tracks close to Xinma station, near the town of Su'ao about 70km (43 miles) from Taipei.
The deputy chief of the Taiwan Railways Administration, Lu Chieh-shen, told a news conference on Sunday that the train was only six years old and had been in "pretty good condition" before the accident.
It is not immediately clear what caused the train to derail, but witnesses told local media they heard a loud noise then sparks and smoke.
Emergency medical responders and firefighters are helping the injured and the defence ministry says it has sent 120 soldiers to help with rescue efforts.
Witnesses reported having to break windows to escape the carriages, and dozens of injured have been transported to local hospitals.
Image copyright AFP
Image caption Authorities say five of the train's eight carriages ended up on their side
An AFP news agency reporter at the scene said more bodies were being removed from the damaged carriages at about 20:00 local time (12:00 GMT) on Sunday night.
Photographs from the scene show seats upended, with parts of the railway tracks twisted through carriage windows in places.
Taiwan's leader, Tsai Ing-wen, described the accident as a "major tragedy" on Twitter.
"My thoughts are with all the victims and their families," she added.
Taiwan has an extensive train network and more than half a million passengers travel on the system every day.
The rail authority has said it is checking to see if any foreigners were on the train at the time.
Share:

Russia nuclear treaty: US warned over threat to scrap deal

Russia nuclear treaty: US warned over threat to scrap deal

Image copyright EPA
Image caption Russia denies building missiles that violate the accord
Russia has condemned US plans to withdraw from a Cold War-era nuclear weapons treaty and threatened to retaliate for a "very dangerous step".
On Saturday, President Trump said he intended to "terminate" the three-decade-old 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty.
He said Russia had been "violating it for many years".
The deal banned ground-launched medium-range missiles, with a range of between 500 and 5,500km (310-3,400 miles).
In the last five decades the US and Russia have signed a range of joint agreements to limit and reduce their substantial nuclear arsenals.
Abandoning the INF - negotiated by US President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1987 - would mark a significant setback for arms control, analysts say.
It was signed near the end of the Cold War, a period of relations between the US and the Soviet Union from 1945 to 1989 marked by intense international tension and overshadowed by the threat of nuclear conflict.
Speaking to Interfax on Sunday, Mr Gorbachev described Mr Trump's decision as a "mistake" and warned it would undermine disarmament efforts.

What exactly has Trump said?

President Trump said the US would not let Russia "go out and do weapons [while] we're not allowed to".
"I don't know why President [Barack] Obama didn't negotiate or pull out," the president said of the INF treaty after a campaign rally in Nevada.
In 2014, President Obama accused Russia of breaching the INF after it allegedly tested a ground-launched cruise missile. He reportedly chose not to withdraw from the treaty under pressure from European leaders, who said such a move could restart an arms race.
US National Security Adviser John Bolton is expected to confirm the withdrawal during talks in Moscow later this week.

How has Russia responded?

"This would be a very dangerous step that, I'm sure, not only will not be comprehended by the international community but will provoke serious condemnation," Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said.
Image copyright Getty Images
Image caption Russia's deputy foreign minister accused the US of using "a method of blackmail"
The treaty is "significant for international security and security in the sphere of nuclear arms, for the maintenance of strategic stability," he told state news agency Tass.
Mr Ryabkov said Russia condemned US attempts to gain concessions "through a method of blackmail".
The minister also told the news agency RIA Novosti that if the US continues to behave "clumsily and crudely" and backs out of international agreements, "then we will have no choice but to undertake retaliatory measures, including involving military technology".
"But we would not want to get to this stage," he added.

'A significant setback'

Analysis by BBC defence and diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus
Concern about Russia's development and deployment of a missile system that breaches the INF treaty predates the Trump administration. But the president's decision to walk away from the agreement marks a significant setback for arms control.
Many experts believe that negotiations should have continued to try to bring the Russians back into compliance. It is, they fear, part of the wider unravelling of the whole system of arms control treaties that helped to curb strategic competition during the Cold War.
Other factors too may have played into President Trump's decision. This was a bilateral treaty between Washington and Moscow. China was free to develop and deploy intermediate range nuclear missiles. Some in the Trump administration feel that the INF treaty places them at a growing disadvantage in their developing strategic rivalry with Beijing .

Has Russia breached the treaty?

The US insists the Russians have, in breach of the deal, developed a new medium-range missile called the Novator 9M729 - known to Nato as the SSC-8.
It would enable Russia to launch a nuclear strike at Nato countries at very short notice.
Russia has said little about its new missile other than to deny that it is in breach of the agreement.
Analysts say Russia sees such weapons as a cheaper alternative to conventional forces.
The New York Times reported on Friday the US was considering withdrawing from the treaty in a bid to counter China's expanding military presence in the western Pacific.
The country was not a signatory of the deal, allowing it to develop medium-range missiles without restraint.

What is the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty?

Image copyright AFP
Image caption Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev and US President Ronald Reagan signed the INF treaty in 1987
  • Signed by the US and the USSR in 1987, the arms control deal banned all nuclear and non-nuclear missiles with short and medium ranges, except sea-launched weapons
  • The US had been concerned by the Soviet deployment of the SS-20 missile system and responded by placing Pershing and Cruise missiles in Europe - sparking widespread protests
  • By 1991, nearly 2,700 missiles had been destroyed. Both countries were allowed to inspect the others installations
  • In 2007, Russian president Vladimir Putin declared the treaty no longer served Russia's interests. The move came after the US withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in 2002
The last time the US withdrew from a major arms treaty was in 2002, when President George W Bush pulled the US out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which banned weapons designed to counter ballistic nuclear missiles.
His administration's move to set up a missile shield in Europe alarmed the Kremlin, and was scrapped by the Obama administration in 2009. It was replaced by a modified defence system in 2016.

More on this story

More Videos from the BBC
  • 'Wayne Rooney? Never heard of him'
  • Hi-tech glasses for ageing eyes
  • BepiColombo spacecraft heads to Mercury
  • 'I carry my heart in a rucksack'
  • Elsewhere on BBC
    You Might Also Like
    From Around the Web
  • (2018) Top 10 Antivirus Of The Year - #1 Now Free. My Antivirus Review
  • Gothic-Style Tower Turned Family Home for Sale in England Mansion Global
  • What Are The 10 Biggest Tech Companies In The World? Trendingstock Today
  • This Week in Celebrity Homes: John Lennon, Kevin Garnett Mansion Global
  • Use This Simple Trick To Protect Your Computer For Free www.the-review-experts.com
  • The tip-off from a Nazi that saved my grandparents

    The god who bars women from his temple

    What's at stake in Afghanistan's election?

    Legendary mountain team's 1921 Everest album

    Video

    Seaweed farming in the Russian Arctic

    The Jamal Khashoggi story so far

    Video

    Bad day? Maybe you should 'add oil'

    The rise of Korean make-up in the West

    Elsewhere on the BBC

    Share:

    Saudi Arabia's Khashoggi story is preposterous, but MBS will get a pass

    What do you give the man who has everything?
    The answer, it seems, is an indemnity from the White House for complicity in an alleged murder.
    Mohammed Bin Salman, Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince, or MBS as he is known, is widely believed to own a $500M mega-yacht, one of the world's most expensive houses, a sumptuous chateau outside Paris and last year to have set a new art world record for the most expensive painting, Leonardo da Vinci's Salvator Mundi which he picked up for a snip at $450M.
    His minions, Saudi Arabia has now admitted, were involved in the demise of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi almost three weeks ago.
    Today though he needs nothing more, it would seem, than to be able to carry on his extravagant life and one-man rule of the Middle East's richest nation as if nothing has happened. And President Trump is helping.
    Trump applauded MBS for his moment of epiphany on Saturday, after his state news agency admitted that 18 days after Khashoggi went missing, that he was in fact dead, just as Turkish officials have believed all along.
    Until Saturday, Saudi officials from MBS down had denied any knowledge of what happened to Khashoggi. MBS told Bloomberg TV on the October 3, the day after Khashoggi went in to the consulate to obtain paperwork that would have allowed him to marry, "My understanding is he entered and he got out after a few minutes or one hour. I'm not sure. We are investigating this through the foreign ministry to see exactly what happened at that time."
    His statement didn't pass the sniff test then, and the flimsy confection of the latest explanation doesn't pass it now.
    It's not just that, in the state-run Saudi Press Agency's preposterous telling, a mild-mannered 59-year-old somehow got himself into a fatal fistfight with multiple Saudi officials. Or that MBS will be in charge of investigating his own intelligence agency that is stuffed full of his hand-picked ultra-loyalists. Or indeed that some of those loyalists are sidelined with no explanation. The whole accounting, released in the dead of night in Riyadh, lacks even the remotest hint of sincerity.
    Part of the statement expresses "deep regret" about "the painful developments." Which raises the question: Why bury this announcement at 1 a.m. local time Saturday, not within the usual working hours for the Saudi Attorney General. And why with so much deep regret and sadness is the most important and painful issue for Khashoggi's family and friends not addressed, the whereabouts of his body or even a reason why this alleged fistfight broke out.
    Even when I first met him 15 years ago, Khashoggi would have been ill equipped for much more than a pillow fight with his children. The intervening years were more than generous to his frame.
    Whichever way you tap it, this cover story rings hollow.
    Another part of the statement would have us all believe Saudi Arabia was keen to help Turkish investigators, almost from the get go. "The Kingdom took the necessary procedures to clarify the truth and began by sending a security team to Turkey on 6 October 2018 to investigate and cooperate with counterparts in Turkey," the statement reads.
    That doesn't even begin to correlate with facts on the ground. Turkish investigators weren't allowed in to the consulate until October 15, almost two weeks after Khashoggi went missing. When they got in, they discovered the Saudis had painted over some of what they needed to examine, Turkish President Recip Tayip Erdogan said. That is not cooperation by any stretch of the imagination, but this is what the Saudis would have the world believe.
    Nothing in the new Saudi narrative explains why the 15 Saudi men whom Turkey believes was a hit squad came to Istanbul the day Khashoggi disappeared, spent the day in the consulate and the nearby Consul General's house before leaving again the same day.
    There is no mention if they are among the 18 people the Saudis claim to have detained. Neither is there anything to plug one of the biggest holes in the mystery: MBS' role in all of it.
    All power in Saudi Arabia passes through his hands. The subordinates of those already sidelined would have dared not execute a mouse without his say so, let alone a well-known and popular critic. It is hard to imagine that the idea to neuter Khashoggi's criticism could not have come to the desk of MBS at some point.
    There is the vaguest of hints in the Saudi statement that MBS was not aware of any plans in relation to Khashoggi. Nothing there to box him too heavily should more evidence, as it likely will, be presented.
    One of those relieved of his duties, Saud al Qhatani, his media enforcer-in-chief, had personally argued with Khashoggi as recently as last year when trying to lure him back to the Kingdom, according to a source with knowlegde of the encounter.
    "Do you think I would create something out of the makings of my own mind and without instruction? I am an employee and a faithful executor of the orders of the King and His Highness the faithful Crown Prince," he wrote in an October 17 tweet.
    Turkey's President isn't buying the Saudi line. "Turkey will shed light on whatever it is that happened. No one should doubt this. We are moving forward with our own investigation," his party spokesman said. Germany's Angela Merkel says the Saudi accounting doesn't wash with her and British officials seem reluctant to buy it at first blush too. The UK's Foreign Office saying it is "considering the Saudi report" as it decides its next steps.
    But nowhere is MBS' future being more hotly debated than in the country he most wants to curry favor with, the United States. And there, bipartisan criticism of the Saudi statement threatens to wreck the hitherto cosy alliance between him and President Donald Trump.
    It's a matter of prestige that the US backs Saudi above others in the region, and MBS above all. He wears as a badge of honor the millions of dollars spent fluffing his image and importance as bulk-buyer of US weapons and like-minded strategic ally.
    Trump says the US hasn't finished its review of the Saudi investigation yet, but as has shown all along he is predisposed to backing the young royal. "It's early. We haven't finished our review or investigation but it's, I think it's a very important first step," he said.
    Trump appears to be giving MBS exactly what he wants, his blessing to carry on regardless.
    It is an incredibly dangerous signal, the most powerful man in the world giving one of its most impetuous and imperious petty tyrants free reign. MBS' iron grip on his Kingdom is tightening, already cowed critics won't dare whisper, and no royal would risk his wrath stepping out of line.
    The implications for Trump and the region are clear. More chaos is coming.
    Share:

    Definition List

    Unordered List

    Support